[BBLISA] anybody doing IPv6 for real operations?/possible presentation topic

[Steve Meuse]

Dean Anderson expunged (dean at av8.com):

> By contrast, IS-IS handles multiple protocols in one process with less
> overhead.  Configuaration & route distribution is always consistent.  
> There are no inter-op problems, and we know its going to work.  Its a
> no-brainer to use IS-IS instead of OSPF4 and OSPF6 together.  So once
> you see that no brainer, the next obvious no-brainer is to use CLNS
> instead of IPV6.  Once again, all the benefits of IPV6, none of the
> drawbacks.  There are no inter-op worries with CLNS.

Is this troll bait, or do you actually believe that?

-Steve